Ground Water Information Center | MBMG Data Center Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Montana Technological University 1300 West Park Street - Natural Resources Building Room 329 Butte Montana 59701-8997 Ph: (406) 496-4336 Fx: (406) 496-4343 |
4/19/2024 |
|
| Home | Well Data | Reports | DrillerWeb | DNRC | Help! | |
The following tables summarize survey responses received by GWIC during November 2002. 194 of 653 users (30%) who logged in during November answered the survey. To view the responses for an individual customer group, click on their hyperlinked customer type. To redisplay all groups, click Show All. |
Customer Types | |||
---|---|---|---|
Customer Type | Surveys | % | Chart |
Commercial | 0 | 0 % | |
Consultant | 0 | 0 % | |
Driller | 0 | 0 % | |
Education (Student) | 0 | 0 % | |
Education (Teacher) | 0 | 0 % | |
Government (County) | 0 | 0 % | |
Government (State) | 37 | 100 % | |
Government (Federal) | 0 | 0 % | |
Industrial | 0 | 0 % | |
NRIS | 0 | 0 % | |
Public/Landowner | 0 | 0 % | |
Realtor | 0 | 0 % | |
Surveyor | 0 | 0 % | |
Show All | 37 | 100% |
1. In the past year how often have you used the GWIC website? | |||
---|---|---|---|
Response | Chart | Count | % |
1-4 times | 3 | 8.33% | |
Monthly | 7 | 19.44% | |
Weekly | 10 | 27.78% | |
2-4 times a week | 6 | 16.67% | |
Daily | 10 | 27.78% | |
Total Responses | 36 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 1 | ||
2. How often does the website meet your needs? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
None of the time | 0 | 0.00% | |
Some of the time | 2 | 5.71% | |
Average | 1 | 2.86% | |
Often | 24 | 68.57% | |
Always | 8 | 22.86% | |
Total Responses | 35 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 2 | ||
3. How easy is the website to use? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
Very Hard | 0 | 0.00% | |
Medium Hard | 1 | 2.94% | |
Medium Easy | 9 | 26.47% | |
Very Easy | 24 | 70.59% | |
Total Responses | 34 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 3 | ||
4. How do you value our website service? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
No value | 0 | 0.00% | |
Little value | 0 | 0.00% | |
Moderate value | 0 | 0.00% | |
Significant value | 15 | 41.67% | |
Critical value | 21 | 58.33% | |
Total Responses | 36 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 1 | ||
5. How would the loss of GWIC service impact you? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
No impact | 0 | 0.00% | |
Little impact | 0 | 0.00% | |
Moderate impact | 2 | 5.56% | |
Significant impact | 14 | 38.89% | |
Critical impact | 20 | 55.56% | |
Total Responses | 36 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 1 | ||
6. How important is is that GWIC contains current data? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
No importance | 0 | 0.00% | |
Little importance | 0 | 0.00% | |
Moderate importance | 2 | 5.56% | |
Significant importance | 14 | 38.89% | |
Critical importance | 20 | 55.56% | |
Total Responses | 36 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 1 | ||
7. How useful are GWIC data in determing drilling depths? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
Never | 0 | 0.00% | |
Rarely | 0 | 0.00% | |
Generally | 5 | 16.67% | |
Often | 18 | 60.00% | |
Always | 7 | 23.33% | |
Total Responses | 30 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 7 | ||
8. How useful are GWIC data in completing property sales? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
Never | 1 | 12.50% | |
Rarely | 1 | 12.50% | |
Generally | 1 | 12.50% | |
Often | 5 | 62.50% | |
Always | 0 | 0.00% | |
Total Responses | 8 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 29 | ||
9. How useful are GWIC data in dealing with land subdivision issues? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
Never | 1 | 6.25% | |
Rarely | 0 | 0.00% | |
Generally | 3 | 18.75% | |
Often | 7 | 43.75% | |
Always | 5 | 31.25% | |
Total Responses | 16 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 21 | ||
10. How useful are GWIC data in completing your ground-water research? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
Never | 0 | 0.00% | |
Rarely | 0 | 0.00% | |
Generally | 3 | 9.09% | |
Often | 14 | 42.42% | |
Always | 16 | 48.48% | |
Total Responses | 33 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 4 | ||
11. If you make ground-water management decisions, how often does access to GWIC improve your decision making? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
Never | 0 | 0.00% | |
Rarely | 0 | 0.00% | |
Generally | 4 | 19.05% | |
Often | 11 | 52.38% | |
Always | 6 | 28.57% | |
Total Responses | 21 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 16 | ||
12. If you make ground-water development decisions, how often does access to GWIC improve your decision making? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
Never | 0 | 0.00% | |
Rarely | 0 | 0.00% | |
Generally | 1 | 7.14% | |
Often | 10 | 71.43% | |
Always | 3 | 21.43% | |
Total Responses | 14 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 23 | ||
13. If you make ground-water protection decisions, how often does access to GWIC improve your decision making? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
Never | 0 | 0.00% | |
Rarely | 0 | 0.00% | |
Generally | 3 | 13.64% | |
Often | 12 | 54.55% | |
Always | 7 | 31.82% | |
Total Responses | 22 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 15 | ||
14. Does internet access to GWIC data save you money? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
Never | 0 | 0.00% | |
Rarely | 0 | 0.00% | |
Generally | 1 | 4.17% | |
Often | 6 | 25.00% | |
Always | 17 | 70.83% | |
Total Responses | 24 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 13 | ||
15. Is access to GWIC data worth the cost to the taxpayer to provide it? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
Never | 0 | 0.00% | |
Rarely | 0 | 0.00% | |
Generally | 2 | 6.06% | |
Often | 6 | 18.18% | |
Always | 25 | 75.76% | |
Total Responses | 33 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 4 | ||
16. Each time you login, access to GWIC provides an economic benefit of...?
* ($ 215.00 / session ) |
|||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
Less than $10 | 2 | 11.11% | |
Between $10 and $100 | 12 | 66.67% | |
Between $101 and $400 | 0 | 0.00% | |
Between $401 and $1000 | 3 | 16.67% | |
Greater than $1000 | 1 | 5.56% | |
Total Responses | 18 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 19 | ||
* Economic benefit is calculated using a weighted average of responses given. Values assigned per catagory are: (<$10) = $5; ($10-$100) = $55; ($101-$400) = $250; ($401-$1000) = $700; (>$1000) = $1100. |
|||
17. How often does the Wells - Printable report meet your needs? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
I do not use it | 2 | 6.06% | |
Rarely meets | 1 | 3.03% | |
Generally meets | 1 | 3.03% | |
Often meets | 15 | 45.45% | |
Always meets | 14 | 42.42% | |
Total Responses | 33 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 4 | ||
18. How often does the Wells - Download report meet your needs? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
I do not use it | 6 | 20.69% | |
Rarely meets | 0 | 0.00% | |
Generally meets | 0 | 0.00% | |
Often meets | 14 | 48.28% | |
Always meets | 9 | 31.03% | |
Total Responses | 29 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 8 | ||
19. How often does the Lithology report meet your needs? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
I do not use it | 1 | 3.23% | |
Rarely meets | 1 | 3.23% | |
Generally meets | 7 | 22.58% | |
Often meets | 14 | 45.16% | |
Always meets | 8 | 25.81% | |
Total Responses | 31 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 6 | ||
20. How often does the SWL Summary report meet your needs? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
I do not use it | 3 | 11.54% | |
Rarely meets | 0 | 0.00% | |
Generally meets | 7 | 26.92% | |
Often meets | 9 | 34.62% | |
Always meets | 7 | 26.92% | |
Total Responses | 26 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 11 | ||
21. How often does the Field Visit report meet your needs? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
I do not use it | 8 | 34.78% | |
Rarely meets | 0 | 0.00% | |
Generally meets | 4 | 17.39% | |
Often meets | 5 | 21.74% | |
Always meets | 6 | 26.09% | |
Total Responses | 23 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 14 | ||
22. How often does the Water Quality report meet your needs? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
I do not use it | 3 | 12.50% | |
Rarely meets | 2 | 8.33% | |
Generally meets | 4 | 16.67% | |
Often meets | 9 | 37.50% | |
Always meets | 6 | 25.00% | |
Total Responses | 24 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 13 | ||
23. How often does the One page Site/Well report meet your needs? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
I do not use it | 2 | 7.69% | |
Rarely meets | 0 | 0.00% | |
Generally meets | 0 | 0.00% | |
Often meets | 13 | 50.00% | |
Always meets | 11 | 42.31% | |
Total Responses | 26 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 11 | ||
24. How often does the One page SWL hydrograph report meet your needs? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
I do not use it | 4 | 18.18% | |
Rarely meets | 1 | 4.55% | |
Generally meets | 3 | 13.64% | |
Often meets | 8 | 36.36% | |
Always meets | 6 | 27.27% | |
Total Responses | 22 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 15 | ||
25. How often does the One page water-quality analysis report meet your needs? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
I do not use it | 3 | 13.04% | |
Rarely meets | 1 | 4.35% | |
Generally meets | 4 | 17.39% | |
Often meets | 8 | 34.78% | |
Always meets | 7 | 30.43% | |
Total Responses | 23 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 14 | ||
26. How often do the Ground-Water Characterization Program and MBMG Projects data reports meet your needs? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
Never | 0 | 0.00% | |
Rarely | 0 | 0.00% | |
Generally | 7 | 29.17% | |
Often | 15 | 62.50% | |
Always | 2 | 8.33% | |
Total Responses | 24 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 13 | ||
27. How often do the Ground-Water Characterization maps meet your needs? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
Never | 0 | 0.00% | |
Rarely | 1 | 5.00% | |
Generally | 4 | 20.00% | |
Often | 12 | 60.00% | |
Always | 3 | 15.00% | |
Total Responses | 20 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 17 | ||
28. Would you use a search by drainage basin option? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
No | 4 | 16.00% | |
Yes | 21 | 84.00% | |
Total Responses | 25 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 12 | ||
29. Would you use a search by geologic source option? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
No | 4 | 15.38% | |
Yes | 22 | 84.62% | |
Total Responses | 26 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 11 | ||
30. Would you use an interactive web-based mapping application? | |||
Response | Chart | Count | % |
No | 2 | 6.67% | |
Yes | 28 | 93.33% | |
Total Responses | 30 | 100.00% | |
Did Not Respond | 7 | ||
Comments
Ground Water Information Center Online © 1998 - 2024 |
Staff | Privacy Statement |