The following tables summarize the survey responses
received by GWIC between November 12th and December 17th, 2010.
To view the responses for an individual customer group, click on
the group's hyperlinked customer type. To redisplay all
groups, click Show All.
|
Tabular View | Survey View | Graphical View
Comments
THE ACT OF CHANGING THE PORTION OF THE SECTION (FOR WELL LOCATION) FROM A WIDELY USED STANDARD (SUCH AS NW1/4) TO AN A B C D DESIGNATOR IS VERY CONFUSING, VERY TIME CONSUMING, AND CREATES A HUGE NUMBER OF ERRORS IN YOUR DATA. WHY WOULD ANYONE EVER EVEN THINK OF SUCH A THING?
A LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED TO THE LOG WOULD BE OF GREAT VALUE.
IF ANYONE IS TO PAY FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THIS DATABASE IT SHOULD NOT BE THE USER. IF IT WERE MAINTAINED BY SOME ENTITY OTHER THAN THE GOVT IT WOULD BE FAR BETTER ORGANIZED AND FAR CHEAPER.
IF I COULD BECOME MORE FAMILIAR W/ WHAT'S AVAILABLE & HOW TO ACCESS IT, I'D TRUST IT MORE. RIGHT NOW IT'S HUNT & PECK. TRYING TO FIND A SITE OF INTEREST WHICH WAS STUMBLED ON, FOR A SECOND TIME, CAN BE DIFFICULT.
A MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF AQUIFERS AND VARIOUS SITES THAT COULD BE CLICKED ON FOR H2O ACCESS/QUALITY SPECIFICS WOULD BE NEET. YOU SEEM TO HAVE DATA ALREADY. STU HEBERT
FIRST TIME USE OF THE WEBSITE, WILL SUBMIT COMMENTS IN THE FUTURE.
|